Paul Fletcher - he of the back-to-back Anzio championships - looking for new worlds to conquer?	The Final between Bert Schoose and Tom Gregorio draws an interested bevy of onlookers.

It was a memorable tournament While the bottom line is that Bert Schoose took the first place wood in this event, as well as several others, several points along the way are worth highlighting:

-         34 participants played, almost a 50% increase when compared to last year's 23 entrants.

-         71 matches played, far surpassing the prior year's 31.

-         TRC was played continuously from Monday to Saturday. (Prior WBCs had the TRC tournament starting Thursday PM or Friday AM.

There were several changes that drove the revitalization of the event. Key among them, from this GM's perspective, was the inclusion of TRC in the Grognard format. 2006 had been a year of 'retreat' so, after significant discussion with the GM running the Grognard pre-con, TRC caste its lot with this format. (For those not familiar with it, Grognardcon features a free-form matching process that qualifies a limited number of participants for a concluding single-elimination tournament component.) The open format allowed a lot of TRC players to get in a game or two, at a time of their choosing, while still preserving the ability of top players to advance to the single elimination portion. One early concern, that top players would win enough games to qualify for the SE portion and then NOT play further matches to jeopardize their standing, did not come to bear as top players continued to play until late Friday. John Popiden's opponent selection was quite noteworthy --he needed to play only three games to qualify, but he beat opponents who had an impressive 14 wins between them! This should hearten any seeking to qualify for the SE portion but can't make it to WBC until late in the week.

Bert Schoose    46 points: 4  games   4 wins
Gary Dickson    46 points:   6 games   5 wins
Tom Gregorio    45 points  8 games  6 wins
John Popiden    44 points:  3 games   3 wins
George Karahalios    42 points:   6 games   5 wins
John Ryan    41 points:  8 games  3 wins
Michael Trobaugh    40 points:    6 games   3 wins
John Ohlin    39  points  14 games  6 wins
Alan Hayes    39 points   7  games  3 wins
Ed O'Connor    38 points  6  games  4 wins
Alan Zasada    38  points  7 games   5 wins

Also noteworthy this year was the switch to the five-turn scenario that had been field-tested at PrezCon earlier in the year. This scenario cut the amount of time required to play TRC while not compromising playability or excitement. This short scenario goes through the end of Jan/Feb 1942 and semi-fixed weather to minimize the impact of weather. From a balance perspective, the Russians took the lead with 39 wins in 71 games. (Bidding continued to be a part of the game, so perhaps the Germans need to bid a bit lower in future matches!) Top players were able to excel at either side, with the survivor in a match generally being the person who displayed the best tactical play on the last turn. In the final matches, endurance and stamina was often a factor as some egregious errors often were combined with nifty cardboard tactics.

And now for some highlights of the single elimination portion.

The first semi-finalist match featured yours truly, Tom Gregorio, vs John Popiden. As the Germans, John had beaten me earlier in the week during the Grognard preliminaries and I wanted to avoid a double loss. With that in mind, I bid enough to be the Germans. A methodical attritional approach, combined with Light Mud/Light Mud weather, saw the Germans emerging victorious as the Russians failed to dislodge the Germans from Leningrad and Stalino. Holding those cities, combined with the capture of Sevastopol, was sufficient for the Germans to win.

The other semi-final featured three-time champ Gary Dickson against Bert Schoose. Like me, Gary had been previously defeated by his opponent in the preliminaries and was determined to not repeat that outcome. To minimize luck, and per the tournament rules, Gary opted to use the ten-turn scenario.  The Sep/Oct and Nov/Dec 1941 weather also was Light Mud/Light Mud while Mar/Apr 1942 turned out Snow. Casualties were heavy, for both sides, right from the beginning. Strong positional play by the Russians saw the 1942 Axis campaigning season begin with positions in Riga, Vitebsk, and Kiev. Gary's Germans resigned at the end of May/June 1942, due to poor position and heavy casualties.

In the Final, Tom relinquished the honor of playing the Germans to Bert.  Based on my observations of his earlier play, he would be going heavy in the north to create a semblance of a threat to Moscow. (Whose capture would yield an automatic Axis win.) Additionally, my intent was to play as if the weather would be Light Mud/Light Mud and preserve the Red Army.  

The Opening: Unfortunately, Bert had an effective Odessa Overrun opening in his kit and he whipped that out to great effect. The end result was that the Russians would not be able to defend on the Bug River in Jul 1941. The Russians defended further back east than normal -- along the Dneiper with strongholds in Kiev (!), Stalino and Kharkov. 

The Mid-Game: At the end of their Sep/Oct turn, the Russians defended a line that included Smolensk, Bryansk, Kharkov, and Stalino.  The Nov/Dec Stuka was correctly used by the Germans to secure Leningrad while clever positioning and solid results saw Stalino and Rostov fall, aided by a nifty September Black Sea invasion. Rostov was recaptured in the Russian half of the turn but, in a critical move, the Germans moved a unit within range of Krasnodar.

The End Game: When the Germans ended their Jan/Feb, their capture of Krasnodar put them at 0 VP, with -2 VP being sufficient to win. At this critical juncture several key errors were made. Example 1: The Germans had assumed Leningrad to be secure; not screening it would allow the Russians to get a 1-1 attack on it. (This failed, although the Russians inexplicably chose to carry this out at 1-2.) Example 2: A combination AR result near Smolensk would allow the Russians to kill a German HQ and capture Vitebsk. This succeeded. Example 3:  The weary Russians made the unbelievable mistake of forgetting to move an armor unit near Krasnodar, to contest the German control, which resulted in the Germans retaining control. After combat was rolled, Bert pointed out the oversight and the Germans then walked away with a well-deserved victory. It was a very exciting match and the outcome ensured that Bert's TRC record would be unblemished at WBC and that he could adorn his wargaming wall with his first-place TRC wood. Good job, Bert.

WBC 2008 Event Overview: While it should be noted that Doug James was denied his fifth TRC wood, astute TRC fans will be quick to point out that Doug didn't attend this year His agent has confirmed Doug's plans to attend in 2008 so Bert will have his work cut out for him if wishes to repeat! 

This event writeup would not be complete without pointing out that good outcomes are the result of many folks working together. Special thanks are due to Bruno Sinigaglio and Bill Morse for managing GrognardCon and I'm sure I'm not alone in acknowledging that this year's TRC success was due in no small part to their tireless efforts.

GM: Tom Gregorio        ASST GM: Gary Dickson, George Karahalios

The Russian Campaign PBeM Tournament:

RUSSIAN CAMPAIGN: The Sixth BPA tournament has concluded with Doug James matching his WBC championship in that game with the email crown as well, this time over Gary Dickson who was unable to attend WBC this year. There were 33 matches played in the Single Elimination tournament of 34 players with 3rd to 6th place laurels awarded to: Scott Abrams, Michael Mitchell, Bert Schoose and Roy Walker respectively.

I am planning the 7th BPA Sponsored The Russian Campaign (4th Edition) PBeM Tournament.

1. Single elimination, 10-turn Barbarossa scenario (with Schoose Option);
2. Initial Seeding by AREA rating (last time I did this randomly);
3. 3-month rounds starting October 9, 2006
4. Exclusive use of TRC 4th edition rules and map
5. Rolling start until November 27, 2006

I am trying to gauge if there is any interest in a Novice tournament run separately from the Standard tournament.  The Novice tournament would be for players new to TRC and for those returning from a long hiatus. Any player would be able to participate in the Standard tournament, but only players who have NOT been to the quarterfinals in the WBC, BPA PBeM or Ladder would be eligible in the Novice tournament.

More details to be found at: http://www.russiancampaign.net under Site News