|
|
Carol Haney and Emily Bacon |
GM Andy Latto and Chris Kizer |
Changing of the Guard ...
Better Late Than Never ...
A change to a 3-heat format for 2012 meant that either two
wins or a win in the first heat entered and a second in another
heat were needed to qualify for the semifinals. There was one
no-show in the top 16, so five of the six players with a first-heat
win and a second joined ten double winners and three-time winner
Alex Bove in the semifinals. The competition was tough; the three
former champions in attendance all qualified, along with two
other former finalists, a 2-time Euroquest champion, and two
former Euroquest semifinalists. That added up to half the field
having been former players at a BPA Final.
The
semifinals presented a difficult GM problem. Shortly after one
of the games had concluded, the players realized that the winner,
Randy Buehler, had used the Cartwright on his last turn despite
having no cards in hand, while the rules specify that the Postmaster
is the only option with an empty hand. Other players had not
scored their final route, knowing that there would be another
chance because Randy could not Cartwright (and then forgot this
detail a moment later when he used the Cartwright anyway). Disqualifying
Randy and awarding the win to the runner-up wasn't a reasonable
option, because the score of the player who failed to score his
final route, knowing that the game could not end, was artificially
low. And the game could not be reconstructed accurately enough
to determine what would have happened if Randy had made a legal
move and the game continued. Perhaps the only thing that could
be done would be to say that the time for correcting errors had
expired when the score was agreed to by all, but it felt wrong
to award the win based on an illegal move that gave a player
a strong advantage. Finally, all the players in the semifinal
agreed to call the game a "no result" and play a second
game. Randy proved that his ability was not dependent on misunderstanding
the rules, as he won the replay as well, and we had our four
finalists, albeit much later. I commend all players in this semifinal
for their sportsmanship in agreeing to what I think was the fairest
resolution of a difficult situation.
But the replay delayed schedule, and those involved only agreed
to replay if this would not conflict with their ability to play
in the Saint Petersburg elimination rounds. So there was
a break, while Amy GM'ed the aforementioned tournament and Randy
and Vien played in it. I knew I had found the best solution to
the problem when I had found a way to proceed where the only
person inconvenienced by the solution was the fourth finalist
and GM, me. While the other three finalists were free after the
Saint Pete tournament (also won by Randy) was over, this
meant that I would have to play and GM the Final of the Thurn
and Taxis tournament while simultaneously GM'ing the Innovation
tourney.
Occasionally, one player enjoys seemingly perfect luck and
coasts to a win, but the Final was marked by bad luck for all
four players. Vien had to discard a route, and this put him out
of contention. All three of the other finalists at some point
used the Administrator to discard six cards to get a look at
six new ones, and found the choices poor enough that they opted
to take a random card from the deck instead! The key moment came
early, when Randy completed his third route; an 8-city monster
that scored bonus chits for green, red-orange, and all colors,
in addition to the 4-point chit for the first 7-city run. While
Andy ultimately scored more bonus chits, Randy's were scored
earlier, and counted more. Amy also had an impressive pile of
scoring chits, but a couple of extra houses left unplayed spelled
her demise, and Randy completed his busy day of winning the T&T
semifinals, then winning them again because he didn't want to
advance based on an illegal move, and winning the St. Pete tournament,
by winning the championship in a 27-26-25 squeaker.
Once again the advantage was with players who went earlier
in the turn order. Out of a total of 51 games played, 18, or
35.3 %, were won by those who went first and third, with only
nine games, or 17.6 %, won by the fourth-place player. Combining
this with data from three previous years, we have a total of
161 games, with first, second, third and fourth to play winning
a total of 31%, 22.3%, 27.3% and 19.2% respectively. This is
a large enough disparity that I will institute bidding victory
points for seating order in the elimination rounds in the future.
|
|
Roni Breza and Eric Brosius |
Jenn Mongold and Katherine McCorry |
|